Research status — passed the battery on 2026-09-22, downgraded on 2026-09-25 under stricter criteria. Do not use for live trading.
Status history·2026-01-10 listed→2026-02-05 retired→now TESTING
40.16%
break-even 33.2% at its realized average win/loss
re-measured (top 10 coins · 1H · 2026-10-06): 40.2%
Percentage of trades that were profitable
1.35
re-measured (top 10 coins · 1H · 2026-10-06): 1.43
Gross profit / gross loss ratio
+145% (top-10, 2yr, non-compounded)
Net profit after all fees and losses
as published (top 10 coins · 1H · 2026-07-14)
Marks next to a metric: ~ = borderline (PF between break-even and 1.5; win rate ≤5 pts above break-even, or 50–55% if none shown) · ! = below the bar, or the strategy is already retired or shelved — a closed verdict outranks its number. No mark = clears it and is still standing.
Wins only under specific regimes or windows in our measurements — the card's bull/bear PF row shows the regime side; strategies that win both windows were still killed by half-year walk-forward instability. A past condition profile, not a recommendation — conditions earn trust only by surviving forward.
Card re-measured: 2026-10-06 · 597 trades analyzed
2026-09-25 downgrade — Verified → Testing. The 2026-07-14 pass below was measured on today’s top 10 coins by market cap, with SL/TP chosen on data up to 2026-07-12. Under stricter criteria added that day (point-in-time coin list, out-of-sample only after the parameter choice, coin concentration, cost stress), the evidence no longer holds: without ZEC and HYPE — two of those ten coins — the full-period PF at 0.05% fee plus 0.20% slippage per fill falls from 1.23 to 0.995, and the window after the SL/TP choice (2026-07-15 → 2026-09-24) has only 64 trades. It returns to Verified only if a point-in-time top-10 re-measure passes, the post-07-12 sample reaches n ≥ 100 with a weekly-cluster CI lower bound above 1, and the PF CI lower bound stays above 1 with any single coin removed. Record: verification index.
2026-07-14 verification: the walk-forward gate mentioned below has now been PASSED on the live engine (card defaults sl3/tp20, top-10): OOS(30%) PF 1.44 (n=165, IS 1.30, overfit LOW), walk-forward PF 1.13 / 1.38 / 1.47 (n 138/162/207). Promoted testing → verified.
2026-07-12 update: the original retirement verdict below is preserved as-is — it was measured at the registry default (sl 7 / tp 6) across the full coin universe. A 2026-07 TP/SL sweep re-measured this strategy at sl 3 / tp 20 on the top 10 coins by market cap and it passed (PF 1.35, MDD 20%, +145% — figures as of that re-measurement; the preset card and home page track the latest daily re-run, so their numbers move with the data). It has been reinstated as a curated simulator preset; OOS held, and on 2026-07-14 it passed the walk-forward gate as well — the verified badge it carried until 2026-09-25 dates from that promotion. The edge thins as you add more coins — the original full-universe loss and the top-10 win are both true, at different scopes.
Overview
Historical record — 2026-02, full universe, SL 7 / TP 6. The results and interpretation below describe that experiment. For the current verdict, see the 2026-09-25 downgrade note at the top of this page.
BB Squeeze LONG was the mirror image of our successful SHORT strategy. Same setup, same indicators, opposite direction. The hypothesis: if squeeze expansion works for shorts, it should work for longs too.
It didn’t.
Results
- Win Rate: 51.0% (barely above coin flip)
- Profit Factor: 0.98 (net negative after fees)
- Total PnL: -$26
Why It Failed
The BB Squeeze signal is direction-neutral — it detects volatility expansion, not direction. The interpretation recorded for that experiment was:
- Shorts benefit from mean reversion — after a squeeze, overextended rallies tend to reverse
- Longs fight against the macro trend — in a bear/sideways market, long breakouts frequently fail
- Asymmetric risk — crypto drops faster than it rises (liquidation cascades)
Lesson at the Time — 2026-02, Full Universe, SL 7 / TP 6
Same indicator, opposite direction, completely different results. Market structure matters more than signal quality. In crypto 2024-2026, the short side has a structural edge that the long side simply doesn’t have.
This was the conclusion of that experiment, not the current verdict. See the 2026-09-25 downgrade note at the top of this page for the current verdict.
Status History: RETIRED (2026-02, full universe) → VERIFIED (2026-07, top-10) → TESTING (2026-09-25)
Retired alongside Momentum LONG on 2026-02-05. The combined analysis of 6 experts at that time unanimously concluded: SHORT only was the correct configuration for that regime.