TESTINGLONG · 1H · INTERMEDIATE

BB Squeeze LONG

Long-side variant of BB Squeeze. Retired in the 2026-02 full-universe run (PF 0.98); the 2026-07 re-measure at sl3/tp20 on the top 10 coins by market cap passed (PF 1.35) and it now ships as a curated simulator preset and passed OOS + walk-forward on 2026-07-14 — verified then; downgraded to testing on 2026-09-25 under stricter criteria.

Battery execution record
Battery passed ·
Downgraded · under stricter criteria — this record is the earlier result, not today's standing
Read inputs and results (JSON)Why (criteria JSON)

Research status — passed the battery on 2026-09-22, downgraded on 2026-09-25 under stricter criteria. Do not use for live trading.


Added: 2026-01-10Retired: 2026-02-05Write-up stats measured: 2026-07-14 SL 3% / TP 20%Measured with certain UTC hours excluded — the same hours the engine has used since its first version (2026-02). Why those hours were chosen is not on record, and random hour sets showed no significant difference.Card re-measured (top 10 coins · 1H · 2026-10-06)10 Coins Tested

Status history·2026-01-10 listed→2026-02-05 retired→now TESTING

Win Rate · as published (top 10 coins · 1H · 2026-07-14)Win Rate — Percentage of profitable trades. Above 50% with good risk/reward is solid.

40.16%

break-even 33.2% at its realized average win/loss

re-measured (top 10 coins · 1H · 2026-10-06): 40.2%

Percentage of trades that were profitable

Profit Factor · as published (top 10 coins · 1H · 2026-07-14)Profit Factor — Total gains divided by total losses. Above 1.5 is strong, above 2.0 is excellent.

1.35

re-measured (top 10 coins · 1H · 2026-10-06): 1.43

Gross profit / gross loss ratio

Total PnL

+145% (top-10, 2yr, non-compounded)

Net profit after all fees and losses

as published (top 10 coins · 1H · 2026-07-14)

Marks next to a metric: ~ = borderline (PF between break-even and 1.5; win rate ≤5 pts above break-even, or 50–55% if none shown) · ! = below the bar, or the strategy is already retired or shelved — a closed verdict outranks its number. No mark = clears it and is still standing.

TESTING

Wins only under specific regimes or windows in our measurements — the card's bull/bear PF row shows the regime side; strategies that win both windows were still killed by half-year walk-forward instability. A past condition profile, not a recommendation — conditions earn trust only by surviving forward.

Card re-measured: 2026-10-06 · 597 trades analyzed

2026-09-25 downgrade — Verified → Testing. The 2026-07-14 pass below was measured on today’s top 10 coins by market cap, with SL/TP chosen on data up to 2026-07-12. Under stricter criteria added that day (point-in-time coin list, out-of-sample only after the parameter choice, coin concentration, cost stress), the evidence no longer holds: without ZEC and HYPE — two of those ten coins — the full-period PF at 0.05% fee plus 0.20% slippage per fill falls from 1.23 to 0.995, and the window after the SL/TP choice (2026-07-15 → 2026-09-24) has only 64 trades. It returns to Verified only if a point-in-time top-10 re-measure passes, the post-07-12 sample reaches n ≥ 100 with a weekly-cluster CI lower bound above 1, and the PF CI lower bound stays above 1 with any single coin removed. Record: verification index.

2026-07-14 verification: the walk-forward gate mentioned below has now been PASSED on the live engine (card defaults sl3/tp20, top-10): OOS(30%) PF 1.44 (n=165, IS 1.30, overfit LOW), walk-forward PF 1.13 / 1.38 / 1.47 (n 138/162/207). Promoted testing → verified.

2026-07-12 update: the original retirement verdict below is preserved as-is — it was measured at the registry default (sl 7 / tp 6) across the full coin universe. A 2026-07 TP/SL sweep re-measured this strategy at sl 3 / tp 20 on the top 10 coins by market cap and it passed (PF 1.35, MDD 20%, +145% — figures as of that re-measurement; the preset card and home page track the latest daily re-run, so their numbers move with the data). It has been reinstated as a curated simulator preset; OOS held, and on 2026-07-14 it passed the walk-forward gate as well — the verified badge it carried until 2026-09-25 dates from that promotion. The edge thins as you add more coins — the original full-universe loss and the top-10 win are both true, at different scopes.

Overview


Historical record — 2026-02, full universe, SL 7 / TP 6. The results and interpretation below describe that experiment. For the current verdict, see the 2026-09-25 downgrade note at the top of this page.

BB Squeeze LONG was the mirror image of our successful SHORT strategy. Same setup, same indicators, opposite direction. The hypothesis: if squeeze expansion works for shorts, it should work for longs too.

It didn’t.

Results


  • Win Rate: 51.0% (barely above coin flip)
  • Profit Factor: 0.98 (net negative after fees)
  • Total PnL: -$26

Why It Failed


The BB Squeeze signal is direction-neutral — it detects volatility expansion, not direction. The interpretation recorded for that experiment was:

  • Shorts benefit from mean reversion — after a squeeze, overextended rallies tend to reverse
  • Longs fight against the macro trend — in a bear/sideways market, long breakouts frequently fail
  • Asymmetric risk — crypto drops faster than it rises (liquidation cascades)

Lesson at the Time — 2026-02, Full Universe, SL 7 / TP 6


Same indicator, opposite direction, completely different results. Market structure matters more than signal quality. In crypto 2024-2026, the short side has a structural edge that the long side simply doesn’t have.

This was the conclusion of that experiment, not the current verdict. See the 2026-09-25 downgrade note at the top of this page for the current verdict.

Status History: RETIRED (2026-02, full universe) → VERIFIED (2026-07, top-10) → TESTING (2026-09-25)


Retired alongside Momentum LONG on 2026-02-05. The combined analysis of 6 experts at that time unanimously concluded: SHORT only was the correct configuration for that regime.

Explore more strategies and their research results.