PRUVIQ vs AlternativesFree backtesting. No signup. 280+ coins. See how we compare.
| Feature | PRUVIQ | TradingView | 3Commas | Cryptohopper | Coinrule | Gainium |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Price (billed monthly) | $0 | $12.95+/mo (annual) | $20+/mo | $29+/mo | $29+/mo | $15+/mo |
| No Account Required | ✓ Instant access | ✗ Email + KYC | ✗ Email + KYC | ✗ Email + KYC | ✗ Email req. | ✗ Email req. |
| Multi-coin Backtest | Many per run | 1 at a time | Not documented | Multi-currency | Via TradingView | Not documented |
| Failure Transparency | ✓ Failures published | ✗ Winners only | ✗ Winners only | ✗ Winners only | ✗ Winners only | ✗ Winners only |
| No Coding Required | ✓ Visual builder | Pine Script | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| Auto-Trading Bot | — Coming soon | ✗ Alerts only | ✓ $20+/mo | ✓ $29+/mo | ✓ $29+/mo | ✓ $15+/mo |
Competitor pricing checked on each vendor's pricing page as of 2026-09-23. Cells show paid-plan floors; TradingView, Cryptohopper, Coinrule and Gainium also offer limited free tiers. Verify current pricing with the vendor before purchase.
SCOREBOARD
Bot platforms, four criteria, sourced facts only
Score = facts met ÷ facts scored. A fact is scored only when it has a source link you can open; unsourced rows are shown but never counted.
Facts last checked 2026-09-07
| Platform | Usability | Features | Price | Transparency | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PRUVIQ |
| 6/6 | |||
| TradingView |
|
|
| 1/15 unverified | |
| 3Commas |
|
|
| 0/15 unverified | |
| Cryptohopper |
|
|
| 1/15 unverified | |
| Coinrule |
|
|
| 1/15 unverified | |
| Gainium |
|
|
| 1/15 unverified | |
| Freqtrade |
|
|
| 1/15 unverified | |
| Streak |
|
|
|
| 0/07 unverified |
✓ met · ✗ not met · ? not documented · ↗ opens the source · a dot means the row comes from our earlier comparison text and has no source link yet, so it is excluded from the score.
DETAILED COMPARISONS
PRUVIQ vs TradingView
Script-free backtesting vs paid Pine Script
PRUVIQ vs Coinrule
Free unlimited backtest vs $29+/mo rule builder
PRUVIQ vs Cryptohopper
280+ coins free vs limited bot subscription
PRUVIQ vs 3Commas
Transparent results vs closed strategy marketplace
PRUVIQ vs Gainium
No signup required vs mandatory account creation
PRUVIQ vs Streak
Crypto-native 280+ coins vs stock-focused platform
PRUVIQ vs Freqtrade
Free, open source, and written in Python. More flexible than us if you code — this page says where each one wins.
$0 — NO SUBSCRIPTION
$0 — No Credit Card
Cryptohopper charges $29–129/month (Explorer–Hero, billed monthly). PRUVIQ is free, forever. No account required to run a simulation.
280+ COINS ANALYZED
Test Across Markets
Test one strategy across many coins in a single run — no per-coin re-runs, no scripting. Find what actually works.
WE PUBLISH FAILURES
Radical Transparency
We document every strategy we killed — and why. Honesty over marketing.
Why These Numbers Matter
Multi-coin testing — Freqtrade and VectorBT require writing Python; TradingView's Strategy Tester runs one symbol per backtest. PRUVIQ runs your strategy across many coins in a single browser run, revealing which markets it actually works in and which it doesn't. This eliminates cherry-picking bias.
Failure transparency — We publish every strategy that failed, with full data. We ran 15 research campaigns across 17 strategy families and nearly all were eliminated; the current survivors and their verdicts live in the strategy journal. Publishing only the winners is what lets survivorship bias inflate backtest results.
No account required — Test any strategy immediately. No email, no KYC, no credit card. Your data stays in your browser. This matters because signup walls create friction that prevents honest evaluation.
Learn more: Trading Guides · Fee Comparison · Strategy Rankings
All comparisons use real backtest data. Try it yourself →